Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"science too powerful"; e.g., Bennett, 2008;Endres, 2009), others were apparently more melioristic (Evans et al, 2009), and still others seemed to suggest that science was already at least partially a subject of, rather than a powerful lord over, public discourse (Jordan, 2004(Jordan, , 2009Ratto, 2006). The oppositional stance of the "science bad" and "science too powerful" studies seems to be at odds with a third, relatively uncommon but apparently growing set of studies, the "Isocratean" studies that offered to improve scientific rhetorics (e.g., Ceccarelli, 2011;Jensen, 2007;Park, 2001;Spoel et al, 2009;Väliverronen and Hellsten, 2002). Instead of assuming that science was inherently or at least seriously flawed in its assumptions or conclusions, or that science was too powerful in the force it exerted in public, these essays assumed that scientists needed a little bit of help conveying their message to the public, and by implication that the world would be better with a little more scientific influence (at least of some kinds) rather than less.…”
Section: Stumbling Into the Gap(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"science too powerful"; e.g., Bennett, 2008;Endres, 2009), others were apparently more melioristic (Evans et al, 2009), and still others seemed to suggest that science was already at least partially a subject of, rather than a powerful lord over, public discourse (Jordan, 2004(Jordan, , 2009Ratto, 2006). The oppositional stance of the "science bad" and "science too powerful" studies seems to be at odds with a third, relatively uncommon but apparently growing set of studies, the "Isocratean" studies that offered to improve scientific rhetorics (e.g., Ceccarelli, 2011;Jensen, 2007;Park, 2001;Spoel et al, 2009;Väliverronen and Hellsten, 2002). Instead of assuming that science was inherently or at least seriously flawed in its assumptions or conclusions, or that science was too powerful in the force it exerted in public, these essays assumed that scientists needed a little bit of help conveying their message to the public, and by implication that the world would be better with a little more scientific influence (at least of some kinds) rather than less.…”
Section: Stumbling Into the Gap(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And this paucity is particularly fascinating because many of the science controversies that scholars have studied have global reach. Thus, there are several studies of global warming (Besel, 2011;Foust & Murphy, 2009;Moore, 2009;Spoel et al, 2009), but they tend not to engage the issue of the ways in which the associated rhetorics (pro, con, other) play out in non-Western contexts. An occasional mention of the different interests of industrialized and industrializing countries does not provide the richness of analysis and understanding that would seem to be available if one actually attended to the way in which "climate change" was discussed in the various regions of the globe.…”
Section: An Academic Route: Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this was the Kiribati Adaptation Programme phase I-III where journalists were excluded, and the study tended to focus mainly on the lay understanding by the public of climate change. Spoel et al (2009;p. 49) argues that climate change entails a rich and timely venue for exploring 'theoretical and practical questions about public understanding, and engagement with science'.…”
Section: Part Of the Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Caruana and Crane (2008) marks a shift of interest from quantitative aspects of consumer behaviour towards an interest in qualitative dimensions of consumer responsibil-Article: Climate-conscious citizenship in a digital urban setting Sophie Esmann Andersen & Anne Ellerup Nielsen ity: it is not about segmenting green consumerism and modelling different shades of green consumers (e.g., Mostafa, 2009), but rather a question of conceptualising consumer responsibility as a process of sense making. It is not about forcing responsible behaviour through scare campaigns (Spoel et al, 2009) or public control of citizen behaviour (D'Souza, 2004), but rather a question of understanding why consumers act responsibly in order to (and as a way to) add meaning in their lives, drawing on an interpretive tradition of consumer research (Østergaard & Jantzen, 2000). Moisander and Pesonen (2002) have explored this interpretive research path of consumer responsibility and ethical consumption as a way of living, exploring the constructing of selves and others as green consumers.…”
Section: The Socially Responsible Consumer-citizenmentioning
confidence: 99%