An intriguing hypothesis is that scientists have different preferences for what they would like to read versus what they are going to cite
2015
Key concepts
Scholarcy highlights
- We have found that—when it comes to abstracts—“more is more,” despite clear and abundant advice to the contrary
- An intriguing hypothesis is that scientists have different preferences for what they would like to read versus what they are going to cite
- Future studies could investigate the relationship between stylistic features and retrievability directly, as well as the strength of the relationship between retrievability and citation performance
Need more features? Save interactive summary cards to your Scholarcy Library.