Skip to main content

Analogical Reasoning in Description Logics

  • Conference paper
Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I (URSW 2006, URSW 2007, URSW 2005)

Abstract

This work presents a method founded in instance-based learning for inductive (memory-based) reasoning on ABoxes. The method, which exploits a semantic dissimilarity measure between concepts and instances, can be employed both to answer class membership queries and to predict new assertions that may be not logically entailed by the knowledge base. These tasks may be the baseline for other inductive methods for ontology construction and evolution. In a preliminary experimentation, we show that the method is sound and it is actually able to induce new assertions that might be acquired in the knowledge base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Küsters, R.: Non-standard inferences in description logics: The story so far. In: Gabbay, D., Goncharov, S.S., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Mathematical Problems from Applied Logic. New Logics for the XXIst Century. International Mathematical Series, vol. 4. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Molitor, R.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Dean, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 96–101. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bacchus, F.: Lp, a logic for representing and reasoning with statistical knowledge. Computational Intelligence 6, 209–231 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bock, H.: Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bock, H., Diday, E.: Analysis of symbolic data: exploratory methods for extracting statistical information from complex data. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgida, A., Walsh, T., Hirsh, H.: Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In: Working Notes of the International Description Logics Workshop, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Edinburgh, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt, S., Küsters, R., Turhan, A.-Y.: Approximation and difference in description logics. In: Fensel, D., Giunchiglia, F., McGuinness, D., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation, pp. 203–214. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bright, M.W., Hurson, A.R., Pakzad, S.H.: Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases. ACM Transaction on Database Systems 19(2), 212–253 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the CLASSIC description logic. In: Torasso, P., Doyle, J., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 121–133. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A dissimilarity measure for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) description logic. In: Bouquet, P., Tummarello, G. (eds.) Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop SWAP 2005, Trento, Italy, vol. 166, CEUR (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In: Pettorossi, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale, CILC 2005, Rome, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A dissimilarity measure for \(\mathcal{ALC}\) concept descriptions. In: Haddad, H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium of Applied Computing, SAC 2006, Dijon, France, pp. 1695–1699. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: Reasoning by analogy in description logics through instance-based learning. In: Tummarello, G., Bouquet, P., Signore, O. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, 3rd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, SWAP 2006, Pisa, Italy, vol. 201, CEUR (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. d’Aquin, M., Lieber, J., Napoli, A.: Decentralized case-based reasoning for the Semantic Web. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 142–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. Journal of Logic and Computation 4(4), 423–452 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Emde, W., Wettschereck, D.: Relational instance-based learning. In: Saitta, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, ICML 1996, pp. 122–130. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Knowledge-intensive induction of terminologies from metadata. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 441–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C.: A declarative kernel for \(\mathcal{ALC}\) concept descriptions. In: Esposito, F., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds.) ISMIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4203, pp. 322–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C.: A similarity measure for the \(\mathcal{ALN}\) description logic. In: Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale, CILC 2006, Bari, Italy (2006), http://cilc2006.di.uniba.it/download/camera/15_Fanizzi_CILC06.pdf

  21. Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C.: Inductive concept retrieval and query answering with semantic knowledge bases through kernel methods. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4692, pp. 148–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gora, G., Wojna, A.: Riona: A classifier combining rule induction and k-nn method with automated selection of optimal neighbourhood. In: Elomaa, T., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H. (eds.) ECML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2430, pp. 111–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Hitzler, P., Vrandečić, D.: Resolution-based approximate reasoning for OWL DL. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 383–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mantay, T.: Commonality-based ABox retrieval. Technical Report FBI-HH-M-291/2000, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Hamburg, Germany (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Resnik, P.: Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 95–130 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence 48(1), 1–26 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psycological Review 84(4), 327–352 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F. (2008). Analogical Reasoning in Description Logics. In: da Costa, P.C.G., et al. Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I. URSW URSW URSW 2006 2007 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89764-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89765-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics