skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2505677acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust question answering over the web of linked data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Knowledge bases and the Web of Linked Data have become important assets for search, recommendation, and analytics. Natural-language questions are a user-friendly mode of tapping this wealth of knowledge and data. However, question answering technology does not work robustly in this setting as questions have to be translated into structured queries and users have to be careful in phrasing their questions. This paper advocates a new approach that allows questions to be partially translated into relaxed queries, covering the essential but not necessarily all aspects of the user's input. To compensate for the omissions, we exploit textual sources associated with entities and relational facts. Our system translates user questions into an extended form of structured SPARQL queries, with text predicates attached to triple patterns. Our solution is based on a novel optimization model, cast into an integer linear program, for joint decomposition and disambiguation of the user question. We demonstrate the quality of our methods through experiments with the QALD benchmark.

References

  1. Sanjay Agrawal, Surajit Chaudhuri, and Gautam Das DBXplorer: A System for Keyword-Based Search over Relational Databases. In ICDE, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nitish Aggarwal. Cross Lingual Semantic Search by Improving Semantic Similarity and Relatedness Measures. In ISWC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sören Auer, Christian Bizer, Georgi Kobilarov, Jens Lehmann, Richard Cyganiak, and Zachary G. Ives. DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. In ISWC, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, and Maarten de Rijke. A language modeling framework for expert finding. Inf. Process. Manage. 45(1):1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, and Maarten de Rijke. Overview of the TREC 2011 Entity Track. In TREC, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Krisztian Balog, Yi Fang, Maarten de Rijke, Pavel Serdyukov, and Luo Si. Expertise Retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 6(2--3):127--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gaurav Bhalotia, Arvind Hulgeri, Charuta Nakhe, Soumen Chakrabarti, S. Sudarshan Keyword Searching and Browsing in Databases using BANKS. In ICDE, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Stefan Büttcher, Charles L. A. Clarke, and Gordon V. Cormack. Information Retrieval: Implementing and Evaluating Search Engines. MIT Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Elena Cabrio, Julien Cojan, Alessio Palmero Aprosio, Bernardo Magnini, Alberto Lavelli, and Fabien Gandon. QAKiS: an Open Domain QA System based on Relational Patterns. In ILD, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennifer Chu-Carroll, James Fan, Branimir Boguraev, David Carmel, Dafna Sheinwald, and Chris Welty.Welty, C. Finding needles in the haystack: Search and candidate generation. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(3):6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marek Ciglan, Kjetil Nørvåg, and Ladislav Hluchý. The SemSets model for ad-hoc semantic list search. In WWW, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hoa Trang Dang, Diane Kelly, and Jimmy J. Lin. Overview of the TREC 2007 question answering track. In TREC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shady Elbassuoni, Maya Ramanath, Ralf Schenkel, Marcin Sydow, and Gerhard Weikum. Language-model-based ranking for queries on rdf-graphs. In CIKM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shady Elbassuoni, Maya Ramanath, and Gerhard Weikum. Query relaxation for entity-relationship search. In ESWC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Anette Frank, Hans-Ulrich Krieger, Feiyu Xu, Hans Uszkoreit, Berthold Crysmann, Brigitte Jörg, and Ulrich Schäfer. Question Answering from Structured Knowledge Sources. Journal of Applied Logic 5(1):20--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Anthony Fader, Stephen Soderland, and Oren Etzioni. Identifying relations for open information extraction. In EMNLP, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hui Fang and ChengXiang Zhai. Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding. In ECIR, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vagelis Hristidis and Yannis Papakonstantinou. DISCOVER: Keyword Search in Relational Databases. In VLDB, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Vagelis Hristidis, Heasoo Hwang, and Yannis Papakonstantinou. Authority-based keyword search in databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 33(1):1--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hao He, Haixun Wang, Jun Yang, and Philip S. Yu. BLINKS: ranked keyword searches on graphs. In SIGMOD, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Heath, T., and Bizer, C. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Johannes Hoffart, Fabian M. Suchanek, Klaus Berberich, and Gerhard Weikum. YAGO2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence 194: 28--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. IBM 2012. Special Issue on "This is Watson" IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(3/4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Aditya Kalyanpur, J. William Murdock, James Fan, and Christopher A. Welty. Leveraging community-built knowledge for type coercion in question answering. In ISWC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Boris Katz, Sue Felshin, Gregory Marton, Federico Mora, Yuan Kui Shen, Gabriel Zaccak, Ammar Ammar, Eric Eisner, Asli Turgut, and L. Brown Westrick: CSAIL at TREC 2007 Question Answering. In TREC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cody C. T. Kwok, Oren Etzioni, and Daniel S. Weld. Scaling Question Answering to the Web. In WWW, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lin, J. J.; An exploration of the principles underlying redundancy-based factoid question answering. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 25(2):1--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Christopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In LREC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ndapandula Nakashole, Gerhard Weikum, and Fabian M. Suchanek PATTY: A Taxonomy of Relational Patterns with Semantic Types. In EMNLP, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zaiqing Nie, Yunxiao Ma, Shuming Shi, Ji-Rong Wen, and Wei-Ying Ma. Web object retrieval. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Anselmo Penas, Eduard H. Hovy, Pamela Forner, Álvaro Rodrigo, Richard F. E. Sutcliffe, Caroline Sporleder, Corina Forascu, Yassine Benajiba, and Petya Osenova. Overview of QA4MRE at CLEF 2012: Question Answering for Machine Reading Evaluation. In CLEF Evaluation Labs and Workshop, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeffrey Pound, Ihab F. Ilyas, and Grant E. Weddell. 2010. Expressive and Flexible Access to Web-extracted Data: A Keyword-based Structured Query Language. In SIGMOD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jeffrey Pound, Alexander K. Hudek, Ihab F. Ilyas, and Grant E. Weddell. Interpreting keyword queries over web knowledge bases. In CIKM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Second Workshop on Question Answering over Linked Data (QALD-2).2012. http://www.sc.cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de/qald-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Deepak Ravichandran and Eduard H. Hovy. Learning surface text patterns for a Question Answering System. In ACL, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Uma Sawant and Soumen Chakrabarti Learning Joint Query Interpretation and Response Ranking. CoRR abs/1212.6193Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Pavel Serdyukov, Henning Rode, and Djoerd Hiemstra. Modeling expert finding as an absorbing random walk In SIGIR, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Christina Unger, Lorenz Bühmann, Jens Lehmann, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Daniel Gerber, and Philipp Cimiano. Template-based question answering over RDF data. In WWW, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Christina Unger, Philipp Cimiano, Vanessa Lopez, Enrico Motta, Paul Buitelaar, and Richard Cyganiak. ILD 2012. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-913/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. David Vallet and Hugo Zaragoza. Inferring the most important types of a query: a semantic approach. In SIGIR, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ellen M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2003 question answering track. In TREC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sebastian Walter, Christina Unger, Philipp Cimiano, and Daniel Bär. Evaluation of a Layered Approach to Question Answering over Linked Data In ISWC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Qiuyue Wang, Jaap Kamps, Georgina Ramirez Camps, Maarten Marx, Anne Schuth, Martin Theobald, Sairam Gurajada, and Arunav Mishra. Overview of the INEX 2012 Linked Data Track. In CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohamed Yahya, Klaus Berberich, Shady Elbassuoni, Maya Ramanath, Volker Tresp, and Gerhard Weikum. Natural Language Questions for the Web of Data. In EMNLP, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jeffrey Xu Yu, Lu Qin, and Lijun Chang phKeyword Search in Databases. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. ChengXiang Zhai. phStatistical Language Models for Information Retrieval. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robust question answering over the web of linked data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
          October 2013
          2612 pages
          ISBN:9781450322638
          DOI:10.1145/2505515

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 October 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate143of848submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader