Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater Yellowstone

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wicked policy problems—those that resist resolution and continuously cycle through different administrative jurisdictions—are time-consuming for the practitioner and expensive. In these wicked policy environs, interest group narratives contribute to this intractability through the continued construction of a policy loser’s tale. Central to our study is the analysis of group maturation with that of policy narrative elements. We explore whether there is a relationship between lobby tactics, financial resources, and professionalization of authorship of narratives and policy narrative elements. We content analyze the policy stories of the Buffalo Field Campaign (BFC) over a 10-year period (1999–2008), using the Yellowstone National Park bison and brucellosis controversy as case material and track how this new interest group’s fundamental policy story has changed over the course of its lifespan. As demonstrated through their choice of lobby tactics, the group does evolve from an unconventional to a conventional interest group, with two out of three of their constructed policy beliefs remaining unchanged and their political tactics consistently focusing on spinning the loser’s tale aimed at expanding the policy arena. Suggestions on the importance of this work to scientists, administrators, and academics are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auer, M. R. (2007). The policy sciences in critical perspective. In J. Rabin, W. B. Hildreth, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (3rd ed., Vol. 14). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. A. (1997). Narratives in popular culture, media, and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (1995). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. Hawthorne: Adeline Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S., & Nocella, A. J., I. I. (Eds.). (2006). Igniting a revolution: Voices in defense of the Earth. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, T., & Barry, D. (2002). Regulation is evil: An application of narrative policy analysis to regulatory debate in New Zealand. Policy Sciences, 35, 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brister, D., & Brown, T. (2000). Department of livestock hazes bison again. Buffalo Field Campaign, Feb http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/pressreleasesarchive9900. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Brister, D., & Mease, M. (2000). Department of Livestock to haze bull buffalo: Activist assaulted by agent. Buffalo Field Campaign, Jan 25. http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/pressreleasearchive9900/. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Brunner, R. D. (1991). The policy movement as a policy problem. Policy Sciences, 24, 65–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffalo Field Campaign. (2005). Buffalo field campaign: Attachment to IRS Form 990, Part III A-E, accesses via Guidestar. http://www.guidestar.org. Paid registration required for full access to data.

  • Buffalo Field Campaign. (2010). http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/aboutbuffalo/bisonslaughterhistory.html. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Cawley, M. R., & Freemuth, J. (1993). Tree farms, mother Earth and other dilemmas: The politics of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Society and Natural Resources, 6(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, A. (1987). Playing God in yellowstone: The destruction of America’s First National Park. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coefield, J., & Geist, D. (2000). Buffalo allies file TRO over illegal bison hazing on Horse Butte. Buffalo Field Campaign. May 9. http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/pressreleasearchives9900/. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Cormier, J., & Tindall, D. B. (2005). Wood frames: Framing the forests in British Columbia. Sociological Focus, 38(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, C. M. (2002). Bison management in Greater Yellowstone. In R. D. Brunner, C. H. Colburn, C. M. Cromley, R. A. Klein, & E. A. Olsen (Eds.), Finding common ground: Governance and Natural Resources in the American West (Vol. 4). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J., Recchia, S., & Rohrschneider, R. (2003). The environmental movement and modes of political action. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 743–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. R. (1985). The narrative paradigm: In the beginning. Journal of communication, 35(4), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as a narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M. A. (2005). To save the wild bison: Life on the edge in Yellowstone. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, G. (2009). Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible: How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. K., & McBeth, M. D. (2010). Narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion & interest group strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layzer, J. (2006). Fish stories: Science, advocacy, and policy change in New England Fishery Management. Policy Studies Journal, 34(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. (2005). Framing peace policies: The competition for reasonant themes. Political Communication, 22, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D., Gray, V., Wolak, J., Goodwin, E., & Kilburn, W. (2005). Reconsidering the countermobilization hypothesis: Health policy lobbying in the American States. Political Behavior, 27(4), 99–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, M. K., & Shanahan, E. A. (2004). Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone Policy Conflict. Policy Sciences, 37, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Arnell, R. J., & Hathaway, P. L. (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. Policy Studies Journal, 35(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mease, M., Brister, D., & Nackoney, S. (1999). Horse Butte buffalo trap construction nearly complete. Buffalo Field Campaign, Mar 22. http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/pressreleasearchive9899/. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Morris, J. M. (2000). The role of narratives in bureaucratic problem solving: The case of bison and brucellosis in Yellowstone National Park. Doctoral dissertation. Idaho State University.

  • Morris, J. M., & McBeth, M. K. (2003). Extractive commodity theory and the new west: The case of bison brucellosis in Yellowstone National Park. Social Science Journal, 40(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, L. (2005). Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights Movement. Social Movement Studies, 4, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, M. A. (2003). Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict. Policy Sciences, 36, 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G. (1991). Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralle, S. B. (2007). Branching out, digging in, environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, J. A. (1999). Preserving Yellowstone’s natural conditions: Science and the perceptions of nature. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, B. H., & Berger, B. K. (2005). Framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the Sierra Club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Brasher, A. M. (1993). From vague consensus to clearly differentiated coalitions: environmental policy at Lake Tahoe, 1964–1985. In P. A. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–168). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seay, S. (2005). Livestock agents slaughter America’s last wild buffalo. Buffalo Field Campaign, Mar 30. http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/press0405/pressrelease0405/. Last Accessed on Mar 18, 2010.

  • Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., Hathaway, P. L., & Arnell, R. J. (2008). Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory. Policy Sciences, 41(2), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., Tigert, L. E., & Hathaway, P. L. (2010). From protests to litigation to youtube: A longitudinal case study of strategic lobby tactic choice for the Buffalo Field Campaign. Social Science Journal, 47(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J., Pelstring, L., & McComas, K. (1999). Using narratives to think about environmental attitude and behavior: An exploratory study. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1998). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermas, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparative social movement research across cultures (pp. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Revised ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J., & Frasure, W. (1998). Culture wars on the frontier: Interests, values, and policy narratives in public lands politics. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Lewis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 303–326). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, J. N. (2007). Strategic lobbying: Demonstrating how legislative context affects interest groups’ lobbying tactics. American Politics Research, 35(6), 826–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, B. K., & Bailey, C. (2005). Framing wilderness: Populism and cultural heritage as organizing principles. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. A. (1997). The wolf in Yellowstone: Science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society and Natural Resources, 10(5), 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Idaho State University, Stop 8319, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA

    Mark K. McBeth, Linda E. Tigert & Lynette J. Sampson

  2. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan

  3. Jacksonsville State University, Jacksonville, AL, USA

    Paul L. Hathaway

Authors
  1. Mark K. McBeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Shanahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul L. Hathaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Linda E. Tigert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lynette J. Sampson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark K. McBeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBeth, M.K., Shanahan, E.A., Hathaway, P.L. et al. Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater Yellowstone. Policy Sci 43, 391–409 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9114-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9114-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation