Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000007
Free first page

References

  • André, E. , Klesen, M. , Gebhard, P. , Allen, S. , Rist, T. (2000, June). Exploiting models of personality and emotions to control the behavior of animated interface agents. In J. Rickel, (Ed.), Proceedings of the workshop on “Achieving Human-Like Behavior in Interactive Animated Agents” in conjunction with the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 3–7). Barcelona: ACH Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baylor, A. L. (2001). Permutations of control: Cognitive considerations for agent-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12, 403–425. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baylor, A. L. , Kim, S. (2008). The effects of agents’ nonverbal communication on procedural and attitudinal learning outcomes. In H. Prendinger, J. Lester, M. Ishizuka, (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents 2008, LNAI 5208 (pp. 208–214). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baylor, A. L. , Ryu, J. (2003). Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 373–395. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. (1989). Facilities for the graphical computer simulation of head and body movements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 455–462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Feist, A. , Elder, S. (1996). Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 213–228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Krämer, N. C. , Petersen, A. , de Ruiter, J. P. (2001). Computer animated movement and person perception. Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 151–166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Petersen, A. , Krämer, N. C. , & de Ruiter, J. P. (2001). Transcript-based computer animation of movement: Evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 303–310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Senokozlieva, M. , Pennig, S. , Al Issa, A. , Fischer, O. (2008). Deciphering the secret code: A new methodology for the cross-cultural analysis of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 269–277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bickmore, T. , Cassell, J. (2004). Social dialog with embodied conversational agents. In J. van Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer, N. Bernsen, (Eds.), Natural, intelligent and effective interaction with multimodal dialog systems. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bickmore, T. , Pfeifer, L. , Jack, B. (2009, April). Taking the time to care: Empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blascovich, J. , Loomis, J. , Beall, A. C. , Swinth, K. R. , Hoyt, C. L. , Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Bickmore, T. , Billinghurst, M. , Campbell, L. , Chang, K. , Vilhjálmsson, H. , & Yan, H. (1999, May). Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. CHI’99 conference proceedings (pp. 520–527). Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Stocky, T. , Bickmore, T. , Gao, Y. , Nakano, Y. , Ryokai, K. , Tversky, D. et al. (2002). MACK: Media lab Autonomous Conversational Kiosk. Proceedings of Imagina02. Monte Carlo: IMAGINA ’02. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Catrambone, R. , Stasko, J. , Xiao, J. (2004). Eca as user interface paradigm. Experimental findings within a framework for research. In Z. Ruttkay, C. Pelachaud, (Eds.), From brows to trust. Evaluating embodied conversational agents (pp. 239–270). Norwell, MA: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clarebout, G. , Elen, J. , Johnson, W. L. , Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents. An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 267–286. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Rosis, F. , De Carolis, B. , Carofiglio, V. , Pizzutilo, S. (2004). Shallow and inner forms of emotional intelligence in advisory dialog simulation. In H. Prendinger, M. Ishizuka, (Eds.), Life-like characters. Tools, affective functions and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dehn, D. M. , van Mulken, S. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Domagk, S. (2008). Pädagogische Agenten in multimedialen Lernumgebungen. Empirische Studien zum Einfluss der Sympathie auf Motivation und Lernerfolg [Pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments. Empirical studies on the influence of likability on motivation and learning]. Berlin: Logos. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Domagk, S. (2010). Do pedagogical agents facilitate learner motivation and learning outcomes? Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 84–97. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fox, J. , Arena, D. , Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 95–113. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Frechette, C. , Moreno, R. (2010). The roles of animated Pedagogical agent’s presence and nonverbal communication in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 61–72. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Graesser, A. C. , D’Mello, S. K. , Craig, S. D. , Witherspoon, A. , Sullins, J. , McDaniel, B. , Gholson, B. (2008). The relationship between affect states and dialog patterns during interactions with AutoTutor. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 293–312. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gratch, J. , Marsella, S. (2004, August). Evaluating the modeling and use of emotion in virtual humans. Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. New York, NY: AAMAS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, B. , Kopp, S. (2003). FlurMax: An interactive virtual agent for entertaining visitors in a hallway. In T. Rist, R. Aylett, D. Ballin, (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 23–26). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The effects of agent affect and gender on learning, interest, self-efficacy, and agent persona. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koda, T. , Maes, P. (1996). Agents with faces: The effect of personification. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN’96), 6, 189–194. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. (2008a). Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Gestaltung und Evaluation von Mensch-Computer-Interaktion [Social effects of virtual assistants. Design and evaluation of human-computer interaction]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. (2008b). Theory of Mind as a theoretical prerequisite to model communication with virtual humans. In I. Wachsmuth, G. Knoblich, (Eds.), Modeling communication with robots and virtual humans (pp. 222–240). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Bente, G. (2007). Die Sozialpsychologie virtueller Helfer [The social psychology of virtual assistants]. In S. Trepte, E. Witte, (Eds.), Von CMC bis Persuasion. Medien und Sozialpsychologie (pp. 103–138). Lengerich: Pabst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Bente, G. (in press). Personalizing e-learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educational Psychology Review. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Bente, G. , Piesk, J. (2003). The ghost in the machine. The influence of embodied conversational agents on user expectations and user behavior in a TV/VCR application. In G. Bieber, T. Kirste, (Eds.), IMC Workshop 2003, assistance, mobility, applications (pp. 121–128). Rostock: Fraunhofer Publica. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Bente, G. , Troitzsch, H. , Eschenburg, F. (2009). Embodied conversational agents: Research prospects for social psychology and an exemplary study. Social Psychology, Special Issue “New Media and Social Psychology”, 40(1), 26–36. First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Simons, N. , Kopp, S. (2007). The effects of an embodied agent’s nonverbal behavior on user’s evaluation and behavioral mimicry. In C. Pelachaud, E. Andre, G. Chollet, J .C. Martin, K. Karpouzis, (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents 2007 (pp. 238–251). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. , Tietz, B. , Bente, G. (2003). Effects of embodied interface agents and their gestural activity. In R. Aylett, D. Ballin, T. Rist, J. Rickel, (Eds.), 4th international working conference on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 292–300). Hamburg: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumhuber, E. , Kappas, A. (2005). The role of dynamic components for the perception of the genuineness of smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 3–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lester, J. C. , Towns, S. G. , Callaway, C. B. , Voerman, J. L. , FitzGerald, P. J. (2000). Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, E. Churchill, (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (pp. 123–154). Boston, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moreno, R. (2003, August). The role of software agents in multimedia learning environments: When do they help students reduce cognitive load? Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Annual Conference, Padova, Italy. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moreno, R. (2004). Animated pedagogical agents in educational technology. Educational Technology, 44(6), 23–30. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moreno, R. , Reislein, M. , Ozogul, G. (2010). Using virtual peers to guide visual attention during learning. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 52–60. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Nass, C. , Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rickel, J. , Johnson, W. L. (2000). Task oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, E. Churchill, (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (pp. 95–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rickenberg, R. , Reeves, B. (2000). The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Letters of CHI 2000, April 2000, 49–56. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schilbach, L. , Wohlschlaeger, A. , Krämer, N. C. , Newen, A. , Zilles, K. , Shah, J. N. , Fink, G. R. et al. (2006). Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia, 44, 718–730. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sproull, L. , Subramani, M. , Kiesler, S. , Walker, J. H. , Waters, K. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction, 11, 97–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sträfling, N. , Fleischer, Y. , Polzer, C. , Leutner, D. , Krämer, N. C. (2010). Teaching learning strategies with a pedagogical agent. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 73–83. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Van Vugt, H. C. , Konijn, E. A. , Hoorn, J. F. , Keur, I. , Eliens, A. (2007). Realism is not all! User engagement with task-related interface characters. Interacting with Computers, 19, 267–280. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar