Event Abstract

Back to Event

Feasibility of A Novel Treatment of Abstract Verbs in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech

Dallin J. Bailey1, 2*, Kiera Berggren1, 3, Christina Nessler1 and Julie Wambaugh1, 2
  • 1 SLC VA HCS, Research and Development, United States
  • 2 University of Utah, Communication Sciences and Disorders, United States
  • 3 University of Utah Health Care, Neuromuscular Research, United States

Introduction Models of sentence meaning emphasize the central role of the verb (Fillmore, 1968; Miller, 1972). These models are the theoretical basis of language production treatments for persons with aphasia such as VNeST (Edmonds, Nadeau, & Kiran, 2009) and “verb is core” treatment (Loverso, Selinger, & Prescott, 1979). However, these treatments have focused on concrete verbs, despite evidence pointing to the frequency of abstract verbs in spoken language (Renvall, Nickels, & Davidson, 2013) and recent evidence supporting the trainability of abstract concepts in persons with aphasia (Kiran, Sandberg, & Abbott, 2009). This study was designed to examine the efficacy of a novel treatment on production of sentences with abstract verbs, in two persons with nonfluent aphasia and apraxia of speech (AOS). Methods Participants Two patients with chronic Broca’s aphasia and AOS due to CVA were enrolled as participants. Extensive pretreatment testing was performed and will be discussed. This testing included assessments of argument structure production, abstract versus concrete lexical access, sentence repetition, speech rate, and narrative discourse. Treatment Description The treatment was largely based on VNeST (Edmonds et al., 2009). Due to lack of imageable stimuli, written and verbal models of the target word were given, along with a request for a sentence with subject and object arguments. Elements of RET (Kearns, 1985) were added to facilitate expansion of initial attempts. Suggestions for expansions were predominantly taken from a corpus (Davies, 2008-2012) to increase ecological validity of practiced sentences. Also, a contrastive stress exercise was included as an AOS treatment component to provide additional motor practice and facilitate flexibility of speech motor plans. Treatment was administered three times per week by certified SLPs and a supervised clinical fellow. Experimental Design The experimental design was a multiple baseline single-subject design across behaviors and participants. Dependent Measure Treatment probes were conducted prior to each second treatment session. Probes included written and verbal models of the target verb, along with an instruction to create a sentence with the target verb that included a “doer” (subject) and an object. Complete instructions will be provided. Probes were scored based on a novel system that emphasized semantic relatedness and plausibility of arguments and order of sentence elements. Stimuli Lexical verbs with high frequencies (Brysbaert & New, 2009) and SVO argument structures were selected as stimuli. Concreteness ratings (Brysbaert, Warriner, & Kuperman, 2014) were used to sort verbs into three abstract lists and one concrete list. Treatment was intended for two of the abstract lists, with the other lists for measuring response generalization. Results Results were been obtained for the first of two planned treatment phases for both participants. Results indicated improved sentence production attributable to the treatment for one of the two participants. The Conservative Dual Criterion (CDC; Swoboda, Kratochwill, & Levin, 2010) was used to aid in visual inspection of graphed probe data. These results indicate the feasibility of the treatment for increasing sentence production with abstract verbs in persons with chronic aphasia and AOS.

Figure 1
Image

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development.

References

Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A Critical Evaluation of Current Word Frequency Norms and the Introduction of a New and Improved Word Frequency Measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977-990.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav Res Methods, 46(3), 904-911. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
Davies, M. (2008-2012). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Edmonds, L. A., Nadeau, S. E., & Kiran, S. (2009). Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(3), 402-424. doi:10.1080/02687030802291339
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The Case for Case. In E. Bach, & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. London: Rinehart and Winston.
Kearns, K. (1985). Response Elaboration Training for patient initiated utterances. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology (pp. 196-204). Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
Kiran, S., Sandberg, C., & Abbott, K. (2009). Treatment for lexical retrieval using abstract and concrete words in persons with aphasia: Effect of complexity. Aphasiology, 23(7), 835-853. doi:10.1080/02687030802588866
Loverso, F. L., Selinger, M., & Prescott, T. E. (1979). Application of verbing strategies to aphasia treatment. In Clinical Aphasiology Conference (pp. 229–238). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
Miller, G. A. (1972). English Verbs of Motion: A Case Study in Semantics and Lexical Memory. In A. Melton, & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding Processes in Human Memory (pp. 335-372). Washington, D.C.: Winston & Sons.
Renvall, K., Nickels, L., & Davidson, B. (2013). Functionally relevant items in the treatment of aphasia (part I): Challenges for current practice. Aphasiology, 27(6), 636-650. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.786804
Swoboda, C. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Conservative Dual-Criterion Method for Single-Case Research: A Guide for Visual Analysis of AB, ABAB, and Multiple-Baseline Designs: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Keywords: Aphasia, Broca, apraxia of speech, Treatment, concreteness, abstract words, verbs, sentence production, Contrastive stress

Conference: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting, Tucson, United States, 18 Oct - 20 Oct, 2015.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Student first author

Citation: Bailey DJ, Berggren K, Nessler C and Wambaugh J (2015). Feasibility of A Novel Treatment of Abstract Verbs in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2015.65.00015

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 01 May 2015; Published Online: 24 Sep 2015.

* Correspondence: Mr. Dallin J Bailey, SLC VA HCS, Research and Development, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, United States, dallinbailey@gmail.com