The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings
2014
Scholarcy highlights
- The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings
- Religious and nonreligious participants did not differ in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts
- Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense of purpose
- Morality science may benefit from a closer look at the antecedents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience
Need more features? Save interactive summary cards to your Scholarcy Library.